nextyearsgirl:

Hey, if you follow Slate on any social media or subscribe to any of their podcasts, I encourage you to delete/unfollow immediately and send a letter to Julia Turner, Editor in Chief (juliaturneratslate@gmail.com), and Amanda Hess (amanda.hess@slate.com) author of this recent, disgusting article on why we need to stop “shaming” convicted rapist Ma’lik Richmond from the infamous Steubenville case, as he has now completed his slap on the wrist punishment and we should all, apparently, get over our outrage and let him get back to the business of living his life free of consequences. This is rape culture at its finest, where rapists get to go back to their lives and back to the football field like nothing happened, and we wring our hands about the “shame” they experience and think nothing of the lifetime of trauma of their victims. The fact that this article was written under their “woman-oriented” banner, Double X Magazine, is even more reprehensible.

I also encourage you to forward the e-mail to their sponsors, Stamps.com and Audible.com (enash@stamps.com, publicrelations@audible.com, marketing@audible.com) to let them know you are ceasing all current and future business with their companies until Slate issues an apology or their sponsorship of Slate content ends. If you send a letter to Turner, please be sure to take this step and cc her and Amanda Hess on the e-mail you send to the sponsors. Let them know you are hitting them in the money.

The above link is a DoNotLink to keep Slate from getting the clicks this article was clearly intended to bait, but if you need the URL to paste into your e-mail to the sponsoring companies, it is below:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/08/11/ma_lik_richmond_returns_to_football_in_steubenville_let_s_let_him_get_on.html

Please e-mail, please tweet, please reblog. Thank you!

I read this article last night and it was just so gross I am so angry about this. 

antiporn-activist:

nineteencallme:

survivorsofkinkunite:

lesradicalfeminisms:

respexual:

antiporn-activist:

How pornographers describe their own videos.
Sorry to wreck your day.

Oh wow this is so empowering!

This is violent misogyny, folks.

And racism.

one of the scariest parts of this is the use of “you” to personalize it, like this is something the men watching should relate to and desire. which they do. if that’s not terrifying i don’t know what is

Yup. Rebecca Whisnant noted this in her lecture at the SPC Boston conference this month. It’s one of their techniques.

inb4 not ALL porn

antiporn-activist:

nineteencallme:

survivorsofkinkunite:

lesradicalfeminisms:

respexual:

antiporn-activist:

How pornographers describe their own videos.

Sorry to wreck your day.

Oh wow this is so empowering!

This is violent misogyny, folks.

And racism.

one of the scariest parts of this is the use of “you” to personalize it, like this is something the men watching should relate to and desire. which they do. if that’s not terrifying i don’t know what is

Yup. Rebecca Whisnant noted this in her lecture at the SPC Boston conference this month. It’s one of their techniques.

inb4 not ALL porn

(via pomeranianprivilege)

edgebug:

instead of watching the 50 Shades trailer, why not just make awkward eye contact with a total stranger at the grocery store for a solid 2 minutes and 34 seconds? you get the same skin-crawling, uncomfortable feeling but without the shitty writing, terrible acting and massive dose of rape culture

(via ro-s-a-spark-s)

luaren:

honestly can’t wait for the 50 shades movie to normalize the manipulation of lower-level female employees.  can’t wait for the new wave of “consent is sexy” banners on the cover of cosmo.  can’t wait for teen girls to think that a controlling relationship is romantic.  can’t wait for sexualized violence to become increasingly mainstream.  and most of all, i can’t wait for bdsm to be labeled a feminist revolution

I mean that last part has already happened tho.

(via accumulatio-artemis)

glowing-ovaries:

yes tell me more about how watching a video called “teen slut gets ass fucked by man” doesn’t make you hate women, tell me more about how watching a video called “nasty whore gets what’s coming for her” doesn’t contribute to rape culture or alter your views on consent. tell me more about how porn doesn’t objectify, degrade and commodify women’s bodies when the only people in hetero porn getting physically and verbally abused are the women.

And they’re shown liking it. Don’t forget that part. In porn, women respond positively to all of the degradation and aggression. But I’m sure this doesn’t alter anyone’s perceptions of women whatsoever.

(via stfueverything)

Mary Anne Layden, PhD, Director of the Sexual Trauma and Psychopathology Program in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania writes a fascinating paper entitled “Pornography and Violence: A New Look at Research.” I would encourage doubters of my thesis to read the entire paper:

“For many reasons, as we shall see, pornography is a very effective teacher of beliefs and behaviors, and one that also teaches its users that the behaviors are acceptable and stimulates them to do so…

Males who viewed sexual violence obtained higher scores both on scales measuring acceptance of interpersonal violence and the rape myth [the belief that women actually enjoy rape and suffer few negative consequences], when compare to males who viewed either a physically violent or neutral film. The increase in attitudes supporting sexual violence following exposure to pornography is greater if the pornography is violent than if it is non-violent.

A similar effect is seen even when the pornography is not violent. Males who are shown non-violent scenes that sexually objectified and degraded women and were then exposed to material that depicted rape indicated that the rape victim experienced pleasure and ‘got what she wanted.’

Even women who were exposed to pornography as a child have a greater acceptance of the rape myth than those who were not. Those exposed to pornography recommend a sentence for a rapists that was half of that recommended by those who had been shown non-pornographic imagery. These subjects appear to have trivialized the crime of rape.”

And then there’s this, as cited by the Berkmen Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School:

[Excerpts of the] Report of the Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography: Section 5.2.1 Sexually Violent Material

“…[C]linical and experimental research … [has] focused particularly on sexually violent material, [and] the conclusions have been virtually unanimous. In both clinical and experimental settings, exposure to sexually violent materials has indicated an increase in the likelihood of aggression. More specifically, the research, … shows a causal relationship between exposure to material of this type and aggressive behavior towards women.

…The evidence also strongly supports the conclusion that substantial exposure to violent sexually explicit material leads to a greater acceptance of the ‘rape myth,’ in its broader sense - that women enjoy being coerced into sexual activity, that they enjoy being physically hurt in sexual context, and that as a result a man who forces himself on a woman sexually is in fact merely acceding to the ‘real’ wishes of the woman, regardless of the extent to which she seems to be resisting…”

And then there’s news stories such as this one out of the UK last year, entitled “Porn ‘drives youngsters to violence during sex,’” where the author notes that “Extreme pornography is driving thousands of young people to commit sex attacks, a study shows. Some nine percent of 14-21-year-olds admitted to carrying out some sort of sexual violence, including one in 50 who had raped someone. Those perpetrators tended to report ‘more frequently being exposed to media that depicted sexual and violent situations,’ the poll of 1,058 people found.”

I could go on. The evidence that pornography, especially violent pornography, both inherently trivializes rape as well as trivializes sexual assault in the minds of those consuming it as so-called entertainment or recreation, is as overwhelming as it is obvious. This is not a very difficult concept to figure out, either.

Regardless of your opinion on porn use, pornography is, at its very core, the systematic dehumanization of those being portrayed and the systematic degradation of unique human beings with personalities, ambitions, personal histories, and perspectives, to a one-dimensional sex object for one-sided consumption. It’s sexually carnivorous, and sexually cannibalistic. If you can boil a person down to a body or a collection of body parts, it’s scarcely surprising that violence against that person can be accepted much more easily by those participating in the dehumanization process of porn use.

As for those who say that my thesis is a moot point because rape culture doesn’t exist at all, I would merely point out that my claim here is not that there is a direct link between those viewing violent porn and sexual violence against women (although many others do make that claim.) The point I am making is that pornography leads to the trivialization of sexual assault, which is how many define the “rape culture.” That point, unfortunately, withstands all objection.

Yes, Porn Does Trivialize Rape, by Jonathon Van Maren

(via gynocraticgrrl)

You cannot be against rape culture without being against porn culture.

If you have a problem with rape jokes because they trivialize rape but you have no problem with pornography, re-evaluate your thought processes.

(via sex-negative)

(669) 221-6251

feminist-phone-intervention:

next time someone demands your digits and you want to get out of the situation, you can give them this number: (669) 221-6251.

when the person calls or texts, an automatically-generated quotation from feminist writer bell hooks will respond for you.

protect your privacy while dropping some feminist knowledge when your unwanted “suitor” calls or texts.

* * * * * * 

because we’re raised to know it’s safer to give a fake phone number than to directly reject an aggressive guy.

because we’re raised to know that evasion or rejection can be met with violence.

because women are still threatened and punished for rejecting advances.

because (669) UGH-ASIF, WTF-DUDE, and MAJR-SHADE were taken.

because why give any old fake number, when you can have bell hooks screen your calls?

so next time, just give out this number: (669) 221-6251

tech to protect.

(via commiekinkshamer)

In the subordination of women, inequality itself is sexualized: made into the experience of sexual pleasure, essential to sexual desire. Pornography is the material means of sexualizing inequality; and that is why pornography is a central practice in the subordination of women.

Andrea Dworkin in Robert Jensen’s Getting Off: Pornography and the End of Masculinity (via mouthwingss)

(via pomeranianprivilege)